![]() Given current trends, 574 million people-nearly 7 percent of the world’s population-will still be living on less than $2.15 a day in 2030. The recent crises have pushed the world further off track from the global goal of ending extreme poverty by 2030. The recent setbacks took place when the speed of progress toward poverty reduction was already slowing, in tandem with subdued global economic growth. By the end of 2022, as many as 685 million people could still be living in extreme poverty. Rising food and energy prices-fueled in part by the war in Ukraine and by climate shocks and conflict-have hindered a swift recovery. The poorest also faced large setbacks in health and education which, if left unaddressed by policy action, will have lasting consequences for their lifetime income prospects. ![]() Their income losses were twice as high as the world’s richest, and global inequality rose for the first time in decades. The world’s poorest people bore the steepest costs of the pandemic. The global extreme poverty rate reached 9.3 percent, up from 8.4 percent in 2019. The number of people in extreme poverty rose by 70 million to more than 700 million people. But the trend was interrupted in 2020, when poverty rose due to the disruption caused by the COVID-19 crisis. This mission underpins our analytical, operational, and convening work in about 140 client countries.įor three decades, the number of people living in extreme poverty- defined as those who live on less than $2.15 per person per day at 2017 purchasing power parity-was declining. The publisher’s lawyer, Andrew Caldecott, said the argument by Harry’s attorneys amounted to “straitjacketing the newspaper’s right to comment.The World Bank Group’s goals are to end extreme poverty and promote shared prosperity. ![]() The judge has not yet considered issues such as whether the story was accurate or in the public interest. In July, Nicklin ruled that the article was defamatory, allowing the case to proceed. Harry claims that the newspaper libeled him when it suggested that the prince lied in his initial public statements about the suit against the government. Harry sued Associated Newspapers over a February 2022 Mail on Sunday article headlined “Exclusive: How Prince Harry tried to keep his legal fight with the government over police bodyguards a secret… then – just minutes after the story broke – his PR machine tried to put a positive spin on the dispute.” Last year, a judge gave Harry permission to sue the government. The 38-year-old prince wants to pay personally for police security when he comes to Britain, but the government said that wasn’t possible. ![]() ShowBiz Minute: Rock, Bachchan, Prince Harry police protection when they stepped down as senior working royals and moved to North America in 2020. The prince, also known as the Duke of Sussex, and his wife, Meghan, lost their publicly funded U.K. He said the article was “fundamentally inaccurate.” Lawyer Justin Rushbrooke said the facts did not support the publisher’s “substantive pleaded defense” that the article expressed an “honest opinion.” over an article alleging he tried to hush up his separate legal challenge over the British government’s refusal to let him pay for police security.ĭuring a hearing at the High Court in London, Harry’s lead attorney asked Judge Matthew Nickin either to strike out the publisher’s defense or to deliver a summary judgment, which would be a ruling in the prince’s favor without going to trial. Harry is suing Mail on Sunday publisher Associated Newspapers Ltd. LONDON (AP) - Lawyers for Prince Harry asked a judge Friday to rule that a tabloid newspaper libeled the British royal with an article about his quest for police protection when he and his family visit the U.K.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |